Along the same lines, Schroders recently wrote down its investment in Revolut, another top-funded challenger bank, by 46%.

It’s not a great look for the sector. 

Want the full post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post N26 and Revolut are facing steep valuation cuts. What does this mean for other challenger banks’ prospects? appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Banking-as-a-service companies enable collaboration between banks and third parties. They help third parties build, launch, and scale banking products and services through banks’ application programming interfaces (APIs). These companies typically partner with legacy banks to provide their non-banking fintech clients with a full range of banking capabilities, which they embed into their clients’ existing platforms.

Want the full expert post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post Market Trend Report: Banking-as-a-service (BaaS) for banking leaders appeared first on CB Insights Research.

In an effort to boost growth, Santander has acquired, partnered with, and invested in fintech companies that enable better customer experiences, make it easier to access credit, and help businesses manage their finances. It has also launched new tech-forward payments and banking products (such as PagoNxt) and stepped into digital asset trading.

Want the full post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post Analyzing Santander Bank’s growth strategy: How the banking giant is investing in fintech appeared first on CB Insights Research.

According to SVB, its clients account for 71% of all fintech IPOs since 2020. It’s clearly plugged into the fintech ecosystem.

The fallout from recent events may leave a hole in fintech that won’t easily be filled. While moving to a new bank for your deposits might be simple, searching for and setting up a payment rails and processing partner is a more difficult process.

Want the full post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post Silicon Valley Bank was at the center of the fintech ecosystem. We break down every fintech sector it touched and 45 companies affected by its uncertain future. appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Within tech, SVB focused on 6 key areas, as shown in the below graphic. Its focus areas included:

• Edtech
• Industrial technology
• Enterprise software
• Digital infrastructure & tech services
• Consumer software, internet, and info services
• Fintech

Want the full post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post Silicon Valley Bank’s investment syndicate map. Which VCs did SVB invest with most? appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Identity verification, know your customer (KYC), & anti-money laundering (AML) solutions verify identities to help banks detect malicious actors and comply with KYC, AML, and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) regulations.

Want the full expert post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post Market Trend Report: Identity verification, KYC, & AML for retail banking leaders appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Identity and access management (IAM) platforms verify identity and provide appropriate access to customers or employees.

Want the full expert post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post Market Trend Report: IAM for retail banking leaders appeared first on CB Insights Research.

However, some top investors like Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) remained active in the space across various deal stages, valuations, geographies, and sub-industries. 

Fintech is central to a16z’s investment strategy. In recent years, the firm has not only shored up its presence in more familiar sectors like banking, but also reached deeper into newer territory like blockchain. 

Of the 206 deals a16z participated in last year, almost a quarter went to fintech companies — more than any other industry. Sixty percent of these fintech investments closed in H1’22, and the remaining 40% closed in H2’22.

Using CB Insights data, we mapped how a16z spread these fintech investments across categories like payments, blockchain, digital lending, and more. 

Below, we dig into a16z’s top 3 fintech targets in 2022, including key deals in each category.

Payments 

More than a quarter (28%) of a16z’s fintech investments in 2022 went to the payments category. Notable investments include:

• SpotOn ($300M Series F): SpotOn offers a cloud-based platform that provides payment solutions for restaurants and small retailers. 
• Jeeves ($180M Series C): Jeeves offers corporate cards and other expense management tools for businesses, with a focus on credit and payments rails across countries and currencies.
• Tally Technologies ($80M Series C): Tally’s app helps consumers pay off credit card debt more quickly by automating payments.

Blockchain

a16z has actively invested in companies developing blockchain platforms for years. In 2022, 22% of its fintech deal volume went to blockchain companies — although most of these deals closed between January and June, before the year-end turmoil that rocked the cryptocurrency markets. Notable investments include: 

• Matter Labs ($200M Series C): Matter Labs is an Ethereum development company building a rollup layer 2 network designed to lower fees and speed up transactions. 
• Lightspark ($175M Series A): Lightspark, launched in May 2022, is building a Bitcoin payments tool.
• NEAR Protocol ($150M Series B): NEAR Protocol is developing a platform for blockchain-based decentralized applications, with a heavy focus on Web3.
  

Digital lending

a16z’s third-most popular fintech category in 2022 was digital lending, accounting for 12% of the firm’s fintech deal flow. Notable investments include: 

• Point Digital Finance ($115M Series C): Point provides a lending marketplace that allows homeowners to borrow against a percentage of the future value of their property.
• Valon ($60M Series B): Valon offers residential mortgage loan servicing technology through a cloud-native platform. 
• Vesta ($30M Series A): Vesta provides a platform for mortgage origination and underwriting that is designed to streamline processes, reduce risk, and help lenders improve their book of business. 

The post Analyzing a16z’s fintech investment strategy: Where did the VC place its biggest bets in 2022? appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Fraud prevention platforms protect organizations and their customers from online threats, including illegitimate transactions, chargebacks, account hijacking, fake accounts, scams, and counterfeit products.

Want the full expert post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post Market Trend Report: Fraud prevention for retail banking leaders appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Threat intelligence solutions help banks understand the cyber threat landscape to thwart potential attacks and reduce the risk of account compromise.

Want the full expert post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post Market Trend Report: Threat intelligence for retail banking leaders appeared first on CB Insights Research.

In December 2021, Square changed its corporate name to Block, separating the corporate entity from its subsidiary businesses that it calls its “building blocks.” Those include Square, Cash App, Spiral, Tidal, and TBD.

Over the last 2 years, Block’s expansion activity through acquisitions, investments, and partnerships point to 2 clear goals for the evolution of the company and its subsidiaries: 

Want the full post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post Analyzing Block’s growth strategy: How the fintech giant formerly known as Square is evolving beyond payments appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Want the full expert post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post 97 companies leveraging AI and machine learning to automate retail banking services appeared first on CB Insights Research.

CB Insights recently analyzed the 50 largest American and European retail banks (by market cap) to identify the 3 most innovative banks in AI. As part of the analysis, we used the CB Insights Earnings Transcript Analytics Engine to mine quarterly earnings call data.

The top banks have mentioned AI and related technologies 200+ times on earnings calls since 2017, with 70% of the banks discussing the tech at least once.

Royal Bank of Canada and TD Bank discussed AI-related strategies most frequently on calls, mentioning the tech on 13 quarterly calls each in the last 5 years.

Below, we surface key highlights and announcements from 4 of the top banks based on 2022 earnings call data. (Note: Quarter mentions reflect date of the call.)

1. TD bank is expanding into healthcare with its AI tech

TD is the only bank among the top 50 that is is expanding into healthcare by licensing its in-house AI platform to a startup. CEO Bharat Masrani discussed the bank’s decision to invest in hospital tech startup Signal 1 in Q2’22. In return, TD will benefit from improvements made to the AI platform by the Signal 1 team. 

Signal 1 will be headed by Tomi Poutanen, the co-founder of TD’s in-house AI division, Layer 6 (an AI startup acquired by TD in 2018 which now forms its applied AI division).

2. JP Morgan saved millions of dollars in fraud losses

Last year, JP Morgan announced plans to expand from 150 major AI projects in production to a thousand in 5 years. In the beginning of 2022, JPM’s earnings transcripts revealed that the bank invests $12B in technology annual, including cloud migration to power machine learning applications.

In Q3’22, CEO Jamie Dimon highlighted one specific AI investment —  anti-fraud systems — that has saved the bank millions in losses.

3. Bank of America’s AI agent is approaching 1B interactions

BoA first announced the launch of its AI assistant Erica in its 2017 earnings call. Since then, the bank has mentioned “Erica” on 17 quarterly earnings calls discussions.

Erica is approaching 1B user interactions, with the bank announcing a 30% YoY increase in Erica users during its Q3’22 call. BoA plans to integrate Erica with its personalized  financial planning tool, Life Plan, which reportedly has over 7M users since launching in 2020.

4. BNP Paribas PARIBAS DOUBLES DOWN ON AI AND ESG

BNP Paribas went from little to no mentions of AI on earnings calls to becoming the bank that made the most number of mentions of AI-related terms in a single call — 15 times in Q1’22 — discussing use cases ranging from anti-fraud tech to ESG data analytics.

CEO Rim Tehraoui said during the call that the bank wants “1,000 value-creating [AI] use cases in production by 2025.” Specifically, AI-powered ESG and sustainable financing are a core focus for the bank, which has a made a number of startup investments and partnerships in this space. The bank mentioned “ESG” 14 times in a single call in Q2’22. 

The post Retail banks’ AI strategies: What we learned from mining earnings calls appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Want the full post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post How BNP Paribas is leveraging AI to manage environmental regulations appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Europe saw the first cohort of challenger banks break out. Since 2014, Europe-based challengers Atom Bank, Tandem, Monzo, Starling Bank, Revolut, and N26 have collectively attracted $6B+ in funding and over 37M customers.

The UK, in particular, was an early incubator for challenger bank activity compared to other regions, as a result of progressive regulations enacted to promote competition and break up monopolies. However, more recently, challenger banks have appeared in other regions around the world, from Australia to Asia to the US.

In this report, we explain what challenger banks are, dive into the playbooks of notable challenger banks, assess how different regulatory approaches have impacted growth, explore paths to profitability, and highlight future trends to watch.

Table of Contents

What is a challenger bank?

• Challenger banks vs. traditional banks
• The shift from in-person to digital banking

How challenger banks leveraged regulation to launch and grow

• 3 regulatory strategies for launching challenger banks
• New regulations help challenger banks expand services
• Challenger banks in the Australian market

The path to profitability for challenger banks

• With network effects, banks can earn massive profits from fees
• Revenue diversification lets smaller or niche banks thrive

Looking ahead: Trends to watch

• Focus on profitability & responsibility
• An increasingly crowded market
• New products & partnerships
• New markets for challenger banks

What is a challenger bank?

Challenger banks are tech companies that leverage software to digitize and streamline retail banking. Challengers use digital distribution channels, typically mobile, to offer competitive retail banking services such as checking and savings accounts, loans, insurance, and credit cards.

Challenger banks vs. traditional banks

Unlike traditional retail banks, which offer physical branches for in-person banking, challenger banks take a digital-first approach, often relying solely on mobile and desktop platforms. Challengers prioritize an improved user experience, appealing to those who want to be able to bank from their phones instead of visiting a retail location.

Challenger banks first made inroads with consumers who lost faith in institutional firms following the 2008 global financial crisis. These companies “challenge” the traditional incumbent business model by charging customers transparent, low fees, providing faster services, and delivering a better user experience through always-available digital interfaces.

Further, many challenger banks target demographics that may be underserved by traditional banks, like consumers in lower income brackets or those lacking credit history.

The shift from in-person to digital banking

In 2009, there were 240K bank branches across Europe. At the time, customers still relied heavily on bank branches and were just starting to embrace online banking. But challenger banks bet that online — particularly, mobile — would be the next channel for retail banking distribution. That has proven prescient.

Since then, the rise of digital banking has mirrored declines in branch banking. The number of bank branches in the European Union has been slashed to 143K. And it’s expected that another 20,000 will close by 2023, according to consulting firm Kearney.

Juniper Research predicts that, by 2026, 4.2B people will be using digital banking services, which include both mobile and desktop channels. Among specific markets, Britain has seen some of the most widespread adoption of digital banking services.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, global shutdowns and branch closures further accelerated digital banking adoption — a boon for many challengers. For example, global mobile banking and payment app usage grew 26% in the first half of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, according to an Adjust and Apptopia survey.

Challenger banks have benefited greatly from the transition to digital, as incumbents still maintain a branch-centric business model. Nevertheless, traditional banks have also developed their own digital offerings, investing significantly in digital transformation to keep up with shifting consumer demand.

How challenger banks leveraged regulation to launch and grow

In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the EU’s progressive regulators have made it easier for challenger banks to obtain the financial licenses necessary to operate. We’ll examine how 6 challenger banks (Atom Bank, Tandem, Monzo, Starling Bank, Revolut, and N26) took advantage of the new regulatory environment to grow.

Atom Bank, Tandem, Monzo, and Starling Bank — all based in the UK — and Germany-based N26 all obtained a full bank charter, which takes up to 2 years to process but widens the services these banks can offer consumers. In pursuing this time-intensive process, these challengers were betting that a charter would build trust with consumers and allow them greater flexibility in building their offerings.

UK-based Revolut’s strategy, on the other hand, was to get an e-money license, which can be obtained much more quickly, though the scope of services that can be offered is more limited. This option was created in 2011, as part of the UK’s Electronic Money Regulations.

Challenger banks have also been able to expand within the EU by leveraging the European Economic Area (EEA) passport. The passport enables a firm licensed in 1 of the 27 EU member states to provide financial products or services in another country without needing further authorization. N26, for instance, has used the passport to expand its service to over 20 EEA countries.

Below, we delve into the divergent regulatory strategies these companies used to acquire customers and launch their first products.

3 regulatory strategies for launching challenger banks

TRADITIONAL APPROACH

Atom Bank, Tandem, and Starling Bank prioritized having a bank charter prior to launch and built a suite of services that required a charter, believing it would create a moat around the platform. Atom Bank, for example, launched a savings account and a lending product for small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) after regulatory approval.

The biggest drawback to this approach is missing the first wave of early adopters. Because of the time-consuming regulatory approval process, Atom Bank was behind on getting a product to market and didn’t launch until mid-2016, 18 months after registering with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

Another drawback to the charter is that it can be revoked. Tandem lost its banking charter after failing to secure funding. It acquired Harrods’ bank division in late 2017 as a way to restore its charter, but that was a costly and time-intensive process.

SEMI-TRADITIONAL APPROACH

Monzo and N26 wanted to get customers onto the platform while they sought charters.

Monzo did this by launching a prepaid card instead of a full account product. The benefits of this strategy include getting products to market faster, getting customer feedback, and fixing bugs during early product releases. But a drawback is that it can jeopardize growth.

Monzo was going through a period of rapid growth, adding a reported 60K users a month, when the company was granted a charter. In December 2017, it stopped adding new customers and announced plans to transition its 500K existing customers off of prepaid cards and onto Monzo’s own current accounts. While it worked to complete this task and reopen registration, Monzo lost out on the activity of hundreds of thousands of waitlisted customers.

Another drawback of this approach is that players must rely on corporate partners while waiting on a bank charter. In N26’s case, it used payments processor Wirecard‘s back-end to get its payments interface up and running. This meant giving Wirecard a cut from every transaction.

FAST-LANE APPROACH

Revolut challenged the conventional go-to-market strategy by applying for an easier-to-acquire e-money license and targeting currency exchange rather than current accounts (similar in use to checking accounts in the US). Revolut initially focused on frequent travelers, a niche it believed was underserved. It built a digital currency exchange app, which allowed people to exchange money more frequently across countries without needing to establish multiple bank accounts.

Revolut leveraged the EEA passport to expand across Europe and partnered with other fintechs to iterate quickly. It was able to launch this product without waiting on a charter, while gaining access to a roster of potential clients for an eventual banking offering.

Revolut has continued to add new products that boost its customer acquisition efforts. For instance, soon after announcing a cryptocurrency trading feature in its app in late 2017, the company crossed the 1M user mark, adding 3.5K users per day.

In 2018, it became the first challenger bank to announce that it was breaking even on a monthly basis. This means that the company was monetizing enough customers to offset the cost of acquiring new ones.

Revolut has since received an EEA charter through the Bank of Lithuania and applied for a charter in the UK in the first quarter of 2021. The company now counts 20M+ individual customers and 500K+ business customers.

The fastest-growing challenger banks — Revolut, Monzo, and N26 — acquired customers rapidly through viral growth strategies and without first seeking a bank charter. As of November 2022, the 3 banks have a combined customer base of over 34M users.

The other 3 companies — Tandem, Starling, and Atom — waited to launch products until receiving their charters, which took up to 2 years. Because of this, these banks burned more cash along the way than their non-chartered counterparts. To date, they have a combined 3.6M customers, just around one-tenth of what their competitors have collectively amassed.

New regulations help challenger banks expand services

In recent years, regulators in the EU and UK have continued to actively enable challenger banks’ growth. This includes regulations like the UK’s open banking standards and the EU’s Revised Payments Services Directive (PSD2), which both went live with phased rollouts in January 2018.

The open banking standards require the UK’s 9 largest bank providers of personal and business current accounts (including Lloyds, Barclays, HSBC, and Santander) to implement open standards for application programming interfaces (APIs).

Open banking and PSD2 standards allow third parties to safely and securely access customers’ account data at their request. This means there’s a big opportunity for fintech companies like challenger banks to plug into traditional banks and build new services for consumers.

Challenger banks in the Australian market

While challenger banks in the UK and Europe have established themselves as known names over the past decade, the Australian banking sector opened to this kind of disruption in 2018. The ups and downs of the nascent Australian challenger bank market serve as a case study — and cautionary tale — for challengers in other regions.

Australia began to welcome challengers after a spate of regulatory changes went into effect in May 2018. These regulatory changes were the result of a year-long investigation into alleged misconduct by many Australian banks.

The Australian banking sector is dominated by 4 big banks: Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Westpac, National Australia Bank, and ANZ Banking Group. Together, they account for 74% of the Australian banking sector, according to data from IBISWorld.

To minimize fraudulent behavior among Australian banks, a Royal Commission made 76 recommendations. Among these was the creation of a license for restricted authorized deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), which would allow challenger banks to operate in a restricted fashion for 2 years while working toward a full ADI license.

Five notable challenger banks emerged out of this regulatory shift: Up, Judo, Volt, Xinja, and 86 400.

Up, one of the first challenger banks to come to the Australian market, did not go the route of acquiring a license. Instead, the bank launched in October 2018 in partnership with Adelaide Bank and Bendigo Bank, which allowed it to circumvent the requirement to get a license and establish a trusted reputation early on.

Judo received its full banking license in April 2019 and was founded with the goal of helping small businesses get loans and lines of credit, among other things. The challenger bank attained unicorn status in December 2020, after a $212M Series D round, which valued it at $1.2B. It went public via IPO in November 2021.

With a strong lending portfolio, Judo is one of the most robust challenger banks in the Australian market. Judo claims that business picked up during the Covid-19 pandemic, as it added nearly $800M of lending to its portfolio, citing customers’ delays and difficulty in accessing traditional banking services during the onset of the crisis. Data from APRA underscores Judo’s claim. During the early stages of the pandemic, the challenger bank’s loan portfolio increased by 40% to nearly $2B, even as overall lending to small businesses fell by 2%.

Volt was the first Australia-based challenger bank to receive a restricted ADI license in May 2018 and then the full license in January 2019. However, it did not immediately launch a banking product. The bank started out by setting up Volt Labs to create awareness about its brand and build trust with its customers to make the transition from a big legacy bank to a challenger bank easier. Volt also partnered with Microsoft and cloud-based tech provider Lab3 to provide white-labeled banking services to other fintech companies in Australia.

However, the Covid-19 pandemic created uncertainty for a number of challenger banks in Australia. Volt was forced to delay its plans to IPO in 2020, and it ultimately closed its business altogether and returned its license in July 2022. It cited the impact of “the pandemic and the current challenging global economic climate” as contributing to its inability to secure the funding necessary to keep the business going.

Another Australia-based challenger bank hurt by Covid-19-related uncertainties was Xinja. The bank, which had taken the ADI route in 2019, was forced to relinquish its banking license and return A$500M ($378M USD) in customer deposits in December 2020. Xinja chalked it up to “COVID-19 and an increasingly difficult capital-raising environment affecting who is willing to invest in a new bank.” Its customers were transitioned to National Australia Bank.

Xinja had entered the market with a prepaid card linked to a mobile app that tracked spending and offered advice on optimizing expenses. It then launched a savings account that offered a high interest rate of 2.25%. This service may have led to the bank going under, as Xinja was unable to generate the cash required to deliver on the promise of high-interest payouts. The bank never created a lending product, from which incoming interest could have offset the interest it was paying to its customers.

Another challenger to emerge was 86 400, a consumer payments and lending platform that was granted a banking license in July 2019. Soon after, the bank announced a $21M funding round led by Morgan Stanley. However, 86 400’s stint as an independent banking entity was short-lived — it was acquired by National Australia Bank (NAB) in January 2021 and merged with UBank, NAB’s own digital bank.

The path to profitability for challenger banks

Fewer than 5% of challenger banks are profitable, according to Simon Kucher & Partners. The majority aren’t even close to breaking even. 

There are 2 primary models for achieving profitability:

• Some challenger banks aim to reach a scale where revenue from interchange fees will make them successful. 
• Others, especially those that serve niche audiences, focus on product and revenue diversification. 

These 2 profit models are not mutually exclusive. Brazil’s Nubank — the world’s largest challenger bank with 70M users across Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico — applies both models. It focuses on increasing the value of each of its customers by cross-selling a variety of products — a digital account, credit cards, insurance, loans, investments, and payments (for businesses). 

Nubank posted a profit in Brazil for the first time in H1’21 and saw record quarterly revenue of $887M in Q2’22. While Nubank went public in December 2021 at a $41.5B valuation, its market cap has since fallen by 44% (as of November 2022) amid volatile economic conditions.

With network effects, banks can earn massive profits from fees

Interchange fees are transaction fees that a business’ bank pays to its customer’s bank whenever that customer makes a payment using a credit or debit card. Many challenger banks in the US rely heavily on debit interchange fees, which typically amount to 1.2% of the transaction value.

Interchange fees can become a significant revenue driver for a challenger bank only if that bank reaches a sufficiently large number of customers. But 2 obstacles make it difficult to achieve this network effect.

First, many account holders still have their primary accounts in legacy banks. This trend is shifting among younger demographics, though. In the US, for instance, 28% of Gen Z and 31% of millennials have a primary checking account at a digital bank, and that percentage is growing, according to Cornerstone Advisors. Coupled with this trend, 25% of Gen Z and 23% of millennials have a primary account at a mega bank, and that percentage is decreasing. 

One challenger bank that has succeeded in gaining scale and capitalizing on network effects is US-based Chime. Of its 13M+ customers, 8M use it as their primary bank. Chime became profitable — though only in terms of EBITDA — during the pandemic.

Another trend that makes it risky to rely too much on interchange fees is the growing popularity of account-to-account transactions, thanks to the increased adoption of digital wallets and social commerce. These transactions are associated with reduced interchange fees for businesses and, according to PYMNTS, rose by 60% in 2020. Millennials and Gen Z, in particular, are opting to use mobile wallets more often than debit or credit cards, even when paying at brick-and-mortar stores.

Revenue diversification lets smaller or niche banks thrive

Diversification is crucial for the vast majority of challenger banks that have not achieved enough scale to profit from transaction fees. In Europe, where interchange fees have been capped at 0.2% and 0.3% for debit and credit card transactions, respectively, challenger banks offer loans as a way to increase revenue and target both consumer and business clients. 

A banking license is a critical advantage for diversification, as it authorizes the institution to provide a wider range of financial products and services. Three UK challenger banks that offer loans and have approved charters have reported attaining profitability: 

• Starling Bank reported its first full-year profit in July 2022
• Redwood Bank, which secured a UK banking license in 2017, made its first profit in late 2021
• Zopa became profitable for the first time in April 2022, just 21 months after obtaining a UK banking license

In contrast, Revolut, which holds an e-money license in the UK but has a European banking license, saw its revenue surge in 2020 thanks to fees from crypto and stock trading. It broke even by November of that year. Revolut also offers insurance products and paid monthly memberships to unlock a range of financial services.

Looking ahead: Trends to watch

In 2022, challenger banks are focused on proving their ability to make a profit, complying with new regulations, and diversifying their products amid competition on all sides — coming from fintech disruptors, tech giants, and traditional corporations.

Focus on profitability & responsibility

TIGHTER MONETARY ENVIRONMENT AND LOOmiNG RECESSION FORCE CHALLENGERS TO CONSERVE CASH

Capital is tight in 2022. Driven by volatile markets and widespread uncertainty, global venture funding dropped by 34% QoQ in Q3’22 — the largest quarterly percentage drop in a decade.

Fintech startups, in particular, may be losing their former luster: They accounted for just 17% of all tech funding in Q3’22, down from a recent high of 25% in Q2’21. More specifically, banking-focused fintechs raised a total of $1.2B in Q3’22, marking an 83% drop YoY.

Rising inflation rates are threatening some challenger banks’ business models. To survive, some may need to raise prices on the services they provide, which could undercut one of the main ways they differentiate from legacy banks. For instance, raising loan rates (to combat the effects of inflation) could alienate a bank’s customers if cheap loans were central to its value proposition. 

Challenger banks that offer above-market interest rates on savings accounts may also suffer if they don’t have enough capital to pay out returns, especially if they haven’t sufficiently deployed deposits as loans to earn income.

Without the option of raising more venture capital, some challengers will need to focus on near-term profits and tighten their spending. The worst-case scenario for these challengers is that they collapse. Australia’s Volt, for example, folded in June 2022 after failing to raise additional funding. Earlier this year, due to its high burn rate, it looked like Varo, a challenger bank with a US charter, could run out of money by the end of 2022 without an influx of funds. Since then, it has taken steps to reduce its burn rate and attempt to put itself back on the path to profitability.

Few challenger banks have a cash cushion large enough to allow them to keep focusing on growth mode without seeking out more capital. A rare case is Revolut — earlier this year it said it would not be raising money within the next 2 years. However, since then, its revenue has plunged amid the broader crypto downturn.

REGULATORS SEEK TO REIN IN FRAUD

Challenger banks are coming under greater regulatory scrutiny, particularly relating to financial fraud and crime. 

For instance, in April 2022, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published a review of financial crime and anti-money laundering (AML) controls at 6 unnamed challenger banks, which collectively had 8M customers. The review was prompted by the release of the UK’s 2020 national risk assessment of money laundering and terrorist financing, which highlighted the risks associated with challenger banks’ speedy onboarding processes. 

The FCA found that:

• Several challenger banks had weak financial crime controls, poor management of transaction monitoring alerts, underdeveloped consumer risk assessment frameworks, and vaguely detailed due diligence processes
• Challenger banks’ fast onboarding processes were linked with insufficient Know Your Customer (KYC) practices in some cases, leading some to fail to identify high-risk clients
• Some challenger banks didn’t allocate sufficient resources to monitoring financial crime

Summing up its findings, the FCA stated, “there cannot be a trade-off between quick and easy account opening and robust financial crime controls.” 

To balance speed of service and compliance, challenger banks need to double down on regtech (regulation technology), which uses AI and automation to perform KYC checks and AML monitoring at scale. 

Some challengers are already making moves here: For instance, UK-based Recognise Bank, a challenger bank for small businesses, announced in July that it had partnered with regtech TruNarrative to make its onboarding process both faster and more compliant.

An increasingly crowded market

NON-TRADITIONAL COMPETITORS EMERGE FROM BIG TECH AND CORPORATIONS

Tech giants like PayPal and Apple are not banks, but they can leverage their massive consumer bases and product ecosystems to siphon consumer activity away from both traditional and challenger banks.

PayPal wants to become a super app where consumers can shop and use a number of consumer financial services. It already offers a Mastercard-based debit card and features for bill payments, direct deposit, buy now, pay later (BNPL), and more. Similarly, Apple offers a Mastercard-based credit card and BNPL options, in addition to popular challenger bank features like transaction categorization.

In Asia, tech giants are also moving further into banking. Grab, a Southeast Asia-based super app that started out as a ride-hailing app, launched GXS Bank in Singapore in partnership with Singtel, a telco. It has full banking licenses in Singapore and Malaysia, and its first product was a savings account.

Non-financial corporations are also entering the banking space.

Walmart, for instance, partnered with investor Ribbit Capital to launch a fintech startup in 2021. Since then, the startup has acquired 2 other fintechs (ONE and Even), and the combined company — called ONE — now offers a single app where consumers can save, shop, and borrow. At the time of the acquisitions, Walmart planned to integrate the app into its own operation in order to provide financial services to consumers — both directly and via employers and merchants.

LEGACY BANKS TRY TO DISRUPT THE DISRUPTORS 

Legacy banks have tried (and sometimes failed) to create their own digital banks. In 2019, JPMorgan Chase closed down Finn, its digital bank, which had amassed only 47K customers in a year of operation. Bó by NatWest had an even shorter life, closing down 6 months post-launch after gaining just 11K customers. 

JPMorgan Chase’s second act is faring better. It launched a digital retail bank in the UK in September 2021, and by May 2022, the arm had gained 500K customers with a combined $10B in deposits and had processed around 20M card and payment transactions. By September, it hit 1M customers and 92M transactions.

Goldman Sachs is putting up a fight even as its Marcus digital bank faces a loss of $1.2B in 2022. GS views Marcus as being a crucial channel for opening up new revenue streams and aims to see $4B in revenue from it in 2024. Marcus currently has 14M+ customers and more than $100B in deposits. It also offers BNPL for home improvement through GreenSky, which it acquired in September 2021 for $2.2B.

Traditional banks might also look to acquire a challenger bank instead. The consolidation process, however, can be rocky. In the year following National Australia Bank’s takeover of Australian challenger bank 86 400, roughly 35% of the employees who remained with the merged entity left. Some former staff cited the culture clash between the challenger and the legacy bank as their reason for leaving.

New products & partnerships

CHALLENGER BANKS DIVERSIFYING THROUGH FINTECH PARTNERSHIPS

For challengers like Revolut and N26, partnering with other fintech companies to add new services has helped them drive down costs and move forward on the path to profitability.

Following this, other challenger banks may ramp up partnerships, especially in the wake of the UK’s open banking standards and the EU’s PSD2. For example, Starling Bank quickly took advantage of the standards, launching a BaaS API marketplace in 2018 and seeking integrations with numerous fintech startups.

Moneybox was one of Starling Bank’s earliest partnerships. Moneybox is a digital wealth management startup that makes fractional investments for customers with spare change that is topped off of every purchase. Moneybox leveraged Starling’s API to improve the investment allocation time from once per week to real-time.

One drawback to this approach, however, is that it’s easy to replicate. For instance, Moneybox has also partnered with Monzo and had an existing partnership with Revolut. Other challenger banks will also likely increase partnerships to achieve cheaper customer acquisition, increase speed to market with new services, and contain upfront infrastructure costs.

Challenger banks may also look to partner with the bulge bracket banks they set out to disrupt in order to take advantage of new open banking requirements, accelerate network speed, and ensure information security. For instance, smaller challengers like Tandem and Atom Bank may look to benefit from larger institutional partnerships as they launch new product categories like alternative credit cards and alternative mortgages.

Because partnerships are costly and create contingency risk, some challenger banks will look to bring products in house through acquisitions. Tandem, for example, acquired Allium, a lender that helps consumers bring green energy into their homes, in August 2020. The bank also snapped up Oplo in January 2022 to expand its consumer lending portfolio to include mortgages, home improvement loans, auto loans, and more.

Brazil’s Nubank is leveraging partnerships to break into a new fintech vertical altogether: cryptocurrencies. In May 2022, it partnered with blockchain infrastructure firm Paxos to allow its customers to trade bitcoin and ether through its mobile app. After just 1 month in operation, the crypto offering had gained 1M users.  

The challenger doubled down on this strategy when it announced, in October 2022, that it would launch its own cryptocurrency in 2023. The token, called Nucoin, will be built on Polygon’s blockchain network. Nubank’s goal with the cryptocurrency is to increase customer engagement by offering discounts and perks across its financial products to token-holders.

CHALLENGER BANKS START OFFERING BUY NOW, PAY LATER SERVICES

Challenger banks are implementing buy now, pay later (BNPL) features to provide more flexible payment options to their customers, while also tapping into new revenue streams. BNPL is estimated to reach $1T in global annual gross merchandise by 2025, representing a massive opportunity for banks and fintechs. 

Monzo and Curve launched BNPL products in September 2021, and​​ more challenger banks are following suit. These include Zopa (UK), Revolut (in Ireland, Poland, and Romania), and Plazo (Spain). 

Monzo’s BNPL product, Monzo Flex, for example, lets customers spread the cost of purchases over 3 installments without interest, while payments spread over 6 or 12 installments incur a 24% annual percentage rate (representative, variable).

Meanwhile, Zopa announced that it would roll out its BNPL offering in a staggered manner in order to align with the development of UK government BNPL regulation. Earlier this year, the UK government announced that BNPL providers will be required to conduct affordability checks, ensure clear and fair advertising, and gain approval from the Financial Conduct Authority. Revolut, which is positioning its service as “responsible BNPL,” says it would conduct soft credit checks using open banking data to qualify customers.

While challengers have to compete with established BNPL players like Klarna, they can potentially offer customers more flexibility in shopping. When using Klarna and other pure-play BNPL providers, consumers are typically limited to the provider’s merchant partners. In contrast, a shopper can use their challenger bank account to pay at a wide range of online and physical stores.

Challengers aren’t alone in identifying the opportunity. Legacy banks have quickly launched their own BNPL products and could be at an advantage, given their massive user bases.

DIFFERENTIATING PRODUCTS THROUGH DEMOGRAPHIC TARGETING

Some challenger banks are focusing on products aimed at highly specific communities and socioeconomic demographics to differentiate themselves in an increasingly crowded market.

In the US, for instance, companies like Kinly, Greenwood, and Cheese focus on underserved minority communities like new immigrants and Black Americans, while Daylight focuses on the LGBTQ+ community. Letter and Unifimoney are building private banking products for high-net-worth individuals, while Capway is focusing on the underbanked by offering low thresholds for account holders. Capway does not require a monthly minimum balance or charge overdraft fees, and it allows users to access their direct deposit early. Along these lines, TomoCredit launched a credit card in March 2021 that does not rely on credit scores — instead, it uses cash-flow data to ascertain a consumer’s creditworthiness. With this product, TomoCredit is targeting young people who may not have credit history.

The same diversification is taking place in Brazil, which has proved a fertile ground for challengers. There, Lady Bank is serving the needs of women in business, Pride Bank caters to the LGBTQ+ community, and Zippi provides credit to micro-entrepreneurs and the self-employed.

This increasingly granular market approach introduces an added layer of competition and puts pressure on challengers to uniquely define their value propositions. Shruti Rai, co-founder of UK-based challenger bank Novus, recommends that new challengers focus on a theme and build services around it in order to engage their customers’ interests.

Novus positions itself as an “ethical challenger bank.” When customers use the Novus debit card to pay for purchases, they earn “impact coins” that they can donate to a cause. The Novus app also has a marketplace featuring sustainable and ethical brands, and customers earn cashback rewards when they shop from those brands.

FINDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES IN EMBEDDED FINANCE

Embedded finance — the practice of non-financial companies offering dedicated financial services, like lending, to customers — is also on the rise. Players in a wide range of sectors are increasingly building banking onto their existing services as an invisible layer. Examples include:

• Gaming: Mana Interactive, a gaming app, launched banking services in May 2022 using embedded finance solutions provided by Helix by Q2, a cloud-native core designed for embedded finance. Mana now offers a checking account and a Visa-powered debit card for gamers that comes with gaming-related rewards and discounts.
• E-commerce: Shopify encourages its merchants to “skip the bank” by opening a Shopify Balance account. Shopify Balance is backed by Evolve Bank & Trust through Stripe’s embedded banking platform.
• Employee solutions: Lyft offers its drivers a debit card and bank account powered by Canada-based PayFare, a digital banking app. Both Lyft’s and Shopify’s embedded banking services are aimed at enabling drivers/merchants to get paid faster and save better.
• Retail: Retail pharmacy chain Walgreens offers Scarlet — a bank account and debit card. Customers earn cashback rewards when they use Scarlet to shop at Walgreens. Walgreens uses InComm Payments’ BaaS platform.
• Corporate services: H&R Block, a tax services company, launched Spruce — a fintech that partners with banks to provide spending and savings accounts, a debit card, advance paychecks, and a feature for saving part of one’s tax refund. Spruce is powered by Pathward, a South Dakota-based national bank formerly known as MetaBank.

For non-financial companies to provide select financial services to their customers, they need fintech infrastructure, which is time-consuming and expensive to build. Because challenger banks already have this infrastructure and the expertise to roll out these services, they stand to gain by contributing to embedded financial services through providing banking-as-a-service.

While fintechs without banking licenses can offer BaaS through their tech stacks and e-money licenses, licensed challenger banks have an edge. They don’t need to partner with a bank to offer products like loans and savings accounts to their BaaS clients, which means they can keep more of the revenue. They can offer not only their technology but also a full suite of financial products and services.

Starling Bank, which started offering BaaS in the UK in 2018, announced the global launch of its services earlier this year. It targets companies across digital banking as well as non-financial sectors like healthcare, retail, and utilities. Aside from extending its banking tech and products, Starling also provides automated AML and KYC solutions to help clients comply with financial regulations.

CHALLENGER BANKS SNAP UP FINTECHS 

As fintech valuations have plummeted in 2022, challenger banks with enough cash on reserve may look to acquire startups at a discount to expand their technology, product suite, or market reach. 

For example, earlier this year, Nubank was reportedly looking for fintechs to acquire at a price cut. Starling Bank was also said to be building “a war chest for acquisitions” with a budget of £400M ($470M USD), following a fresh influx of funds from its existing investors.

A number of challengers have already made moves on this front. Examples include:

• In March 2022, Danish challenger bank Lunar announced plans to buy Norway-based Instabank for $135M. Instabank operates in Finland, Germany, Sweden, and Norway and offers savings accounts as well as secured and unsecured loans. Lunar raised $77M at a valuation of $2B that same month.
• Chetwood Financial acquired Yobota for an undisclosed sum in March 2022. Yobota will provide the core banking system to BaaS clients, while Chetwood’s banking license will enable the merged entity to offer a wider suite of financial products and services.
• After securing $37M in Series C funding in March 2022, farmer-focused challenger bank Oxbury bought its platform provider Naqoda. Naqoda is being rebranded as Oxbury Earth and will be the bank’s platform for offering BaaS beyond the UK. 

New markets for challenger banks

In addition to launching new products, challenger banks are betting on new markets beyond their home regions.

CHALLENGER BANKS IN THE US: A FRACTURED REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

In their bids to enter the US market, N26, Monzo, and Revolut face significantly higher barriers to entry due to regulation and competition.

Not only must banks abide by federal regulations, but they also must adhere to the laws governing financial services activity in each state.

Challenger banks that do try to expand in the US also face competition from existing fintechs. In July 2020, US-based challenger bank Varo became the first fintech to receive a full bank charter in the US, although it took over 3 years to achieve and cost Varo an estimated $100M. Similarly, after years of effort, point-of-sale payments company Block (then known as Square) landed its own full-service banking charter in March 2021.

US fintechs that want to obtain a charter in less time may choose to acquire a traditional bank. In January 2022, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Reserve conditionally granted national bank status to SoFi after it bought Golden Pacific Bank, a community bank in California.

Seeking a full-service charter in the US is expensive, legally risky, and time-intensive, so going this route won’t be feasible for most challenger banks, domestic or abroad.

Even so, Revolut applied for a bank charter in the US in March 2021. While Revolut launched in the US with basic services in 2020 by partnering with a domestic bank, the charter would allow it to expand its products to include personal loans, deposit accounts, and business banking. With Revolut’s charter application in the UK still pending, though, its chances of getting approved in the US remain slim.

N26 and Monzo never got charter approval and chose different market entry routes instead. N26 launched in the US in 2019 through a partnership with Axos Bank but left in early 2022 to focus on the European market. Monzo finally entered the US in February 2022, just months after it withdrew its application for a banking license in the country. It has partnered with Ohio-based Sutton Bank to offer bank accounts to US clients, and it also offers a Mastercard debit card.

CHALLENGER BANKS IN LATIN AMERICA: A CHALLENGER BANK HAVEN

Latin America also represents a strong growth opportunity — and, subsequently, a competitive market — for challenger banks.

Seventy percent of the population in the region is unbanked or underbanked. In addition, mobile phone adoption is high in the region, at more than 70%. These 2 factors offer ripe conditions for challenger banks to disrupt the traditional banking sector.

N26 received its license to operate in Brazil in early 2021, after announcing plans to launch in the country 2 years earlier. Revolut is preparing to launch in Brazil by the end of 2022 and has applied for a license to operate as a direct lending business in the country.

Brazil, in particular, has become a vibrant market for challenger banks.

Alongside Nubank, another leading challenger bank in Brazil is Neon. Neon was founded in 2016 and has a focus on savings and investment products for Brazil’s working class and lower-income residents.

Argentina is South America’s second-largest challenger bank market after Brazil, with many players vying for customers. Uala is one of the largest. Founded in 2017, the challenger bank has expanded to Mexico and Colombia and now has 5M clients across Latin America. After acquiring Wilobank, a digital bank with a license, Uala is now expanding its services to include banking functions like payment of salaries and pensions. 

Mexico is also fast becoming a challenger bank hub. An estimated 90% of the country’s residents don’t have access to credit cards, making it an ideal market for challenger banks. In addition, consumers are tech-savvy and willing to adopt digital banking solutions. Regulators are also embracing fintech companies to help boost financial inclusion. Within just 18 months of launching there, Nubank had onboarded more than 2M customers and become the country’s most active issuer of new cards. 

CHALLENGER BANKS IN FRONTIER & EMERGING MARKETS

Frontier and emerging markets can be lucrative for fintechs that fulfill needs unmet by traditional institutions, provided that regulators in these countries welcome innovation. For unbanked individuals, a challenger bank has a good chance of becoming their primary bank — especially if that bank keeps barriers to entry low, such as by not requiring minimum account balances.

The Asia-Pacific (APAC) region is also home to a number of challenger banks. The region’s unbanked population of 1B people, coupled with strong mobile use, makes it an ideal market for digital finance solutions. According to Mordor Intelligence, 63% of banking customers in APAC could be using challenger banks’ services by 2025. 

Within Southeast Asia, regulators in Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, and Vietnam have already granted full digital banking licenses. Banking in the region is fragmented owing to different regulations and languages, and no regional leader has emerged.

A similar narrative plays out in Africa, where over 400M people remain unbanked. One player aiming to form a pan-African bank is Kuda Bank. It started in Nigeria, where it has a microfinance banking license and claims to have around 5M users.

As challenger banks expand their reach, it’s evident that no product or market is off the table. However, they’ll need to make the right strategic bets in order to leverage regulation to their benefit and stand out from the rest of the pack.

The post The challenger bank playbook: How 6 digital banking upstarts are taking on retail banking appeared first on CB Insights Research.

The continent’s antiquated banking system (serving mainly the affluent) and largely underbanked population have created the perfect breeding ground for fintech growth, speeding up both development and adoption of new technologies.

Want the full expert post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post 187 companies transforming financial services in Latin America appeared first on CB Insights Research.

For example, Capital One has applied for 40+ AI patents related to vehicles, reflecting its emphasis on its auto underwriting tool. Meanwhile, Bank of America, whose AI assistant has now crossed 1B user interactions, is continuing to apply for patents related to intelligent agents and user intent recognition.

Want the full expert post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post What the top retail banks are patenting in AI appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Canada-based fintech startups — several of which have made it onto CB Insights’ annual Fintech 250 list of promising companies over the years — are building products across a broad range of applications, including payments, lending, banking, wealth management, blockchain, and more.

Want the full expert post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post 95 companies transforming the Canadian fintech landscape appeared first on CB Insights Research.

But the firm is now looking to expand far beyond its traditional business lines, such as investment banking and asset management.

For example, it recently launched a digital consumer bank called Marcus and partnered with Apple to launch a credit card. Goldman is also building an embedded finance offering to allow its financial services — such as digital lending, escrow services, and payments processing — to be integrated with third-party platforms like e-commerce sites via APIs.

Want the full expert post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post Analyzing Goldman Sachs’ growth strategy: How the 150-year-old global financial institution is reinventing itself appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Banking startups were also hit hard, with dollars invested falling to the lowest level since 2018. But even with financing becoming tighter, technologies are still emerging that could shake up the industry.

Want the full post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post 3 banking trends to watch appeared first on CB Insights Research.

By offering simple, customizable banking experiences, these platforms are encroaching on banking incumbents’ territory and quickly gaining market share.

Want the full expert post? Become a CB Insights customer.

If you’re already a customer, log in here.

The post Prioritizing 8 technology categories that are transforming core banking services for retail banks appeared first on CB Insights Research.

The tech giants — such as Meta, Apple, Google, and Amazon — are well-positioned to do well in fintech, one key reason being that they all have far-reaching platforms with gigantic user bases. This creates opportunities to seamlessly integrate financial services into existing products through partnerships or in-house efforts, scale them up with ease to reach users already bought into a company’s ecosystem, and then benefit from network effects as they gather mountains of data on how users actually respond to these services.

With the big tech companies looking for new revenue lines, expect fintech to remain a key focus for them in the years to come.

Download the report to find out:

• The major tailwinds fueling big tech activity in fintech
• The competitive advantages of different tech giants in fintech
• Where big tech is competing in fintech

REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:

• Big tech investment activity in fintech is declining. Big tech companies have participated in 10 fintech deals worth a total of $1.2B in 2022 so far — their slowest pace of deal activity in the space for years.
• Big tech competition intensifies across digital wallets and e-commerce. Apple and Google are now in fierce competition for the digital wallet category. Both giants are eyeing a slice of the digital ID market, but Apple has a potential edge due to its partnership with the TSA. Meanwhile, Google and Meta are emerging as new e-commerce hubs, competing for Amazon’s market share.
• Big tech is experimenting with a wide range of fintech offerings, but some are still finding their footing. Google canceled its banking initiative Plex before the rollout, leaving long waitlists behind. Similarly, Meta ended its crypto initiative Diem after 3 years. However, the companies are far from abandoning fintech — Google, for example, has put its focus back on digital enablement.

The post The Big Tech in Fintech Report: How Meta, Apple, Google, & Amazon are battling for the future of financial services appeared first on CB Insights Research.

The equity deal-making activity of large American and European retail banks reflects the breadth of AI use cases within the sector. While banks were initially focused on virtual assistants and personal finance management tools, they’re now making deals across a variety of use cases — including property intelligence, AI developer tools, and continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) automation. This indicates that AI could benefit a number of banking functions.

However, only 3 of the 50 banks have acquired an AI startup so far, and only 8 have applied for AI-related patents in the US. AI innovation in banking is also limited by the shortage of AI talent. Right now, larger banks are competing for a limited pool of top AI researchers. 

In this report, we identify the retail banks leading in AI and look at how they are building and using the tech.

To pick the top 3 retail banks in AI, our analysts looked at a number of metrics, including earnings call transcripts, partnerships and licensing agreements with AI vendors, AI patent applications, internal R&D, team strength, tech spend, AI investments and acquisitions, and recent product launches.

Table of contents

1. Top 3 retail banks in AI
2. Appendix and methodology

Top 3 retail banks in AI

For each of the 3 winners, we highlight its sources of key AI talent and major AI initiatives in production.

Note: The sections below are not intended to contain an exhaustive list of key people at the bank or projects in production.

Capital One is the leading applicant of AI patents in the United States, among the 50 banks analyzed in this report, having submitted 430+ applications to date. AI for anti-fraud and improving the online experience of card users are high on Capital One’s list of priorities.

It is 1 of only 3 banks on the list to have made an AI acquisition, having acquired AI consultancy firm Notch in 2018. Notch’s 16-person team joined the Capital One Center for Machine Learning. The center now focuses on areas including graph machine learning, AI explainability, anomaly detection, and natural language processing.

The bank has made a major push toward public cloud adoption — phasing out its on-prem data centers — further enabling high-compute machine learning applications.

Who is Capital One targeting for AI talent?

Capital One has hired AI leadership from companies like Facebook, Bell Labs, and Fidelity. Below, we highlight a few notable hires that are helping to lead the bank’s AI initiatives.

• Abhijit Bose, MVP, head of enterprise machine learning (ML) and AI engineering. Previous position(s): head of engineering at Facebook AI Research, managing director and head of data science at J.P. Morgan, and VP of data science at American Express.
• Nurtekin Savas, head of machine learning and data science. Previous position(s): senior VP of machine learning and artificial intelligence at Fidelity.
• Senthil Kumar, chief scientist at Capital One Center for Machine Learning. Previous position(s): applied scientist at Bell Labs.

AI initiatives at Capital One

Capital One has deployed a diverse set of AI projects, focusing on everything from improving the mobile app experience for consumers to building internal developer tools for the bank’s engineers. 

• Anti-fraud and security: Capital One partnered with startup Signifyd for “authorization rate optimization” — using AI to minimize the number of legitimate credit card transactions declined for suspected fraudulent activity. Separately, the bank is partnering with startup Securonix to develop cloud-native cybersecurity solutions. Capital One Ventures has also participated in 2 of Securonix’s funding rounds.
• Auto loan approval: Capital One’s Auto Navigator — an ML-based application that pre-qualifies users for auto financing and can “underwrite every car in America and for any consumer in a fraction of the second” — is one of its earliest ML-based product launches. More recently, the bank piloted augmented reality features that allow users to scan a car they see and get information about its make, model, and financing options.
• Web payments: The bank uses machine learning at the edge (on the consumer’s device) to identify payment pages and payment fields on websites. This is part of Capital One’s virtual card number generation feature, which allows users to create a unique virtual credit card number for each merchant they transact with online and limit their exposure to potential security breaches. 
• Diagnosing and fixing mobile app issues: The bank built an internal ML tool for its DevOps engineers to help identify mobile app issues and respond to app failures in real time. To prevent app downtime for customers, Capital One indicated that it would look to move the algorithms beyond failure detection to proactive prevention in future iterations.
• Open-source AI development tool: Capital One released an open-source tool called rubicon-ml in 2021 to support version control and experiment tracking during the AI development process.

In his 2022 letter to shareholders, J.P. Morgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon wrote that the bank was spending hundreds of millions of dollars on AI and seeing identifiable returns on its tech bets. JPM spent $12B on technology in 2021 alone. 

JPM had 115 major AI projects in production as of 2021, with plans to scale to 1K projects in 5 years. The bank has applied for 70+ AI patents in the US since 2017, with recent patent topics covering everything from economic forecasting to synthetic data generation and sensitive data discovery in documents. 

In addition, JPM has participated in 8 equity deals for startups since 2019, including a $175M mega-round to CI/CD automation vendor Harness.io.

Who is JPM targeting for AI talent?

JPM has hired top AI talent from academic and commercial organizations — including Capital One, Carnegie Mellon University, S&P Global, and Google — for its AI research team. Below, we highlight 2 notable hires that are helping to lead the bank’s AI initiatives.

• Manuela Veloso, head of AI research. Previous position(s): head of the machine learning department at Carnegie Mellon University, president of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
• David Castillo, managing director, firmwide head of AI/ML tech & global product line leader of AI/ML tech. Previous position(s): MVP at Capital One’s Center for Machine Learning, adjunct professor in the computer science department at the University of Maryland.

AI initiatives at JPM

The bank’s AI research division is focusing on a broad range of functions, like anti-fraud, customer experience, and policy compliance.

• Anti-fraud: As of 2021, JPM had spent around $100M on the development of anti-fraud systems for consumer payments. The investment reportedly brought the bank’s annual fraud losses down by 14% from 2017 to 2021. It currently offers Safetech Fraud — an anti-fraud solution for e-commerce merchants that uses AI to identify fraudulent behaviors like card testing. 
• Synthetic financial datasets: These datasets are used for applications where real-world data is sparse or privacy concerns restrict data sharing. For example, they can represent anti-money laundering behavior and customer journey flows. The bank has applied for patents related to the generation of these datasets in a manner that protects user privacy.
• Property intelligence: The bank partnered with Reonomy, which uses machine learning to bring together property data from public and private sources, to provide in-depth property insights to its commercial real estate clients. 
• Sports analytics: JPM took a minority stake in sports analytics company KAGR. The Wall Street Journal deemed it an “unusual partnership” — underscoring the bank’s unique opportunity to use sports data and analytics to support its wealthy clients who own or are looking to buy sports teams. During the pandemic, KAGR used machine learning to predict fans’ willingness to return to live sports venues across 30 US markets. It tapped into demographic data, location-specific Covid-19 data, and historic ticketing data, among other datasets.
• AI infrastructure: JPM built Omni, an in-house data platform for its engineers and developers, to speed up and standardize AI development across the bank.

Among evaluated banks, Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) was one of the first to launch AI research labs across Canada. By November 2017, RBC had already opened its Borealis AI labs in Edmonton, Toronto, and Montreal. In 2018, which kicked off with RBC announcing it would invest $2.5B into technology initiatives over the course of the year, the lab network expanded to comprise “60 PhD-level researchers across five Canadian research centers.”

RBC has applied for 60+ AI patents in the US since 2017. Last year, its applications were centered around topics such as facial recognition tokenization, AI explainability, and fairness testing.

RBC has open-sourced some of its AI tools for the research community at large and made AI trustworthiness a core focus.

Who is RBC targeting for AI talent?

RBC has hired researchers from the University of Toronto, Facebook Reality Labs, and biometrics startup Nymi. Below, we highlight 2 notable hires that are helping to lead the bank’s AI initiatives.

• Foteini Agrafioti, chief science officer and head of Borealis AI. Previous position(s): co-founded and served as the CTO of smart wristband and ECG monitoring startup Nymi.
• Greg Mori, senior research director at Borealis AI. Previous position(s): director at The Artificial Intelligence Network of British Columbia, visiting scientist at Google. 

AI initiatives at RBC

In a 2017 earnings call, RBC announced the initial launch of NOMI, its AI-powered financial well-being assistant. Since then, AI projects at the bank have scaled and now cover everything from custom hardware to automated coding.

• Custom-built GPU servers: These servers are powered by NVIDIA GPUs and have been deployed on-premises at the bank, reportedly reducing the time it takes to run AI analysis on client data from days to minutes.
• Electronic trading: RBC built Aiden, an AI-based electronic trading platform that uses deep reinforcement learning to perform 32M calculations per order and adapts to changing market conditions. Its AI algorithm is designed to help reduce slippage (the difference between expected and actual trading prices).
• Property intelligence: RBC Ventures has invested in multiple funding rounds for property intelligence startup Ojo Labs. The two organizations also established a partnership to connect Ojo’s home buyers and sellers in Canada with mortgage professionals at RBC.
• Portfolio management: The bank invested in (and is a client of) Boosted.ai, a startup developing no-code machine learning tools that can automatically adjust positions on fund manager stock picks. 
• AI-powered coding: Borealis AI launched Turing text-to-SQL, a tool that converts natural language queries into SQL code, enabling non-technical users to work with relational databases.
• AI ethics and transparency: Borealis runs Respect AI, an online hub with open-source tools and educational resources focused on AI fairness, explainability, data privacy, and governance.

Appendix and methodology

For this report, we analyzed data on the 50 largest American and European retail banks by market cap (data as of 9/21/22).

For our data-informed scoring process for selecting the winners, we used CB Insights datasets such as key people data, earnings transcript data (based on keyword searches for common AI-related terms), news mentions, patent applications (based on keyword searches of title and abstract for common AI-related terms), partnership data, and startup deals data.

For investment and M&A activity, we included the relevant investment arms and subsidiaries of the listed banks, but we excluded investment management units such as Merrill Lynch. We checked each bank’s vendor relationships and investments against our artificial intelligence startup collection, which includes 8K+ startups that build hardware and infrastructure for AI, sell AI software-as-a-service, or sell products that use AI as a core differentiator.

The post The 3 retail banks leading in AI — and how they’re deploying the tech appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Mega-rounds also accounted for a smaller percentage of total funding (34%) compared to the average of 66% in 2021.

Below, check out a handful of highlights from our 150-page, data-driven State of Fintech Q3’22 Report. For deeper insights, all the record figures, and a ton of private market data, download the full report.

Other Q3’22 highlights across fintech include:

• Mega-round funding came in at $4.4B, the lowest level seen since 2018.
• Fintech unicorn births fell below double digits for the first time since 2020, with just 6 new unicorns in Q3’22.
• M&A deals dropped 14% QoQ to 155 deals, an 8-quarter low. The number of SPACs surpassed IPOs for the first time ever.
• Europe (32%) surpassed the US (24%) in late-stage deal share for the first time since Q4’18.
• US fintech funding fell 43% QoQ to $5.1B, reaching its lowest point since Q1’20.
• Coinbase Ventures was the most active fintech investor in Q3’22, backing a total of 16 fintechs and surpassing Tiger Global Management, which topped the list during the previous 2 quarters.

The post State of Fintech Q3’22 Report appeared first on CB Insights Research.

Some of this year’s winners are building safer and more efficient ways to send and receive payments. Others are striving to make banking, loans, mobile wallets, and investing products available to historically underserved populations all over the world. 

Using the CB Insights platform, our research team selected these 250 winners from a pool of over 12,500 eligible private companies, including applicants and nominees. They were chosen based on factors including proprietary Mosaic scores, funding, market potential, business relationships, investor profile, news sentiment analysis, competitive landscape, team strength, and tech novelty. The research team also reviewed over 2,000 Analyst Briefings submitted by applicants. 

Clients can access the entire Fintech 250 list and interactive Expert Collection here. (If you don’t have a CB Insights login, create one here.)

Companies are categorized by their primary focus area and client base. Categories in the market map are not mutually exclusive. Please click to enlarge.

Want to be considered for future rankings? Fill out this initial application form (it’ll take no more than a few minutes). If selected, you’ll be asked to complete our Analyst Briefing Survey so that our analysts can better understand your products, customers, and market traction.

FINTECH 250 COHORT HIGHLIGHTS

Below are a few highlights from the Fintech 250 Class of 2022.

New vs. repeat winners: Nearly two-thirds (64%) of this year’s cohort are repeat winners: 144 were on last year’s list and 16 have made their way back onto the list after winning in a prior year. That leaves only 90 new winners (36% of the list), the fewest ever since we started the Fintech 250. 

Why is the new winner cohort so small? In the past, many winners would exit via IPO or M&A and lose eligibility for the list. Today, fintech leaders are staying private longer, especially amid this year’s market turmoil. This has allowed them to retain their eligibility through multiple list rounds. Additionally, factors such as rising inflation, interest rate hikes, and struggling public tech stocks have made it more difficult for new entrants to make a splash in the already maturing fintech market. 

Some of the biggest names in the industry, like Stripe and Klarna, have certainly faced their fair share of obstacles, including layoffs and valuation cuts. But when analyzing the data — including revenue, number of customers and customer growth, partnerships, and equity funding — most of these better-established fintech leaders remain on top.

Global reach: Globalization is a key theme for this year’s Fintech 250. The winners represent 33 different countries (by headquarters location) across the globe — 7 more than last year. Just over half (53%) of the selected companies are headquartered in the US, which is the fewest we’ve seen in the Fintech 250 since 2017. The UK came in second with 31 winners (12%), followed by India with 14 (6%), Brazil with 9 (4%), and Germany with 7 (3%).

Stemming from the broader theme of globalization comes localization — the practice of serving local markets and regions. This is a strong focus for winners in emerging markets like India, South America (11 winners, 4%), and Africa (6 winners, 2%).

For example, 3 of this year’s first-time winners are building payment networks in Africa: MFS Africa, TeamApt, and Paga.

B2B vs. B2C: About two-thirds (64%) of this year’s Fintech 250 are B2B, and 36% are B2C. The B2B-B2C split represents a broader shift in market sentiment away from consumer-facing fintechs. This has been driven in part by reports released this year citing the lack of neobank profitability as well as the visible struggle of public B2C fintech stocks like Robinhood, Coinbase, Affirm, and NuBank.

The largest B2B fintech winners by valuation are Stripe ($74B internal valuation), Checkout.com ($40B), Plaid ($13.5B), and Brex ($12.3B).

Most-represented categories: The fintech categories comprising the most winners are payments processing & networks with 33 (13%), insurance with 25 (10%), cryptocurrency with 24 (10%), core banking & infrastructure with 19 (8%), and retail investing & wealth management with 17 (7%).

This marks payments processing & networks’ second straight year as the top category by number of winners. This category includes B2B providers of e-commerce and point-of-sale (POS) payments processing, APIs, payouts, cross-border payments, and more. It also tied with cryptocurrency for the most new winners at 11. Notable new Fintech 250 champions in the payments processing & networks space include card reader and POS system provider SumUp, gaming payments platform Coda Payments, and Brazil-based CloudWalk (the developer of POS solution InfinitePay).  

All but one of this year’s insurance winners were also featured in our inaugural Insurtech 50, published in June 2022. The category includes companies selling insurance products and services directly to customers (i.e., individuals or businesses buying an insurance policy), like Digit Insurance in India and SMB-focused Next Insurance. It also includes companies like Cambridge Mobile Telematics and Shift, which sell technology to reinsurers and insurance brokers.

Despite the crypto market downturn this year, startups in the space still account for a significant share of this year’s Fintech 250 list. Data on funding, top investor support, revenue, and business relationships still point to the long-term momentum of these companies. Notable players include crypto exchange Binance as well as Web3 infrastructure providers ConsenSys and Fireblocks.

Overall funding & valuation trends: The Fintech 250 cohort has raised over $115B in equity funding across over 1,100 deals since the start of 2017 (as of 9/20/2022). In 2021 alone, winners raised over $51B across 337 equity deals. That’s an average of more than one funding round per company in a single year.

The top 3 winners by total equity funding raised since 2017 are Ant Group (who’s had to delay an IPO due to Chinese government regulations), Klarna, and Chime.

This year’s list includes 159 unicorns with a $1B+ valuation — almost two-thirds (64%) of the total list. While that stat definitely jumps off the page, it’s a little less shocking when you consider that there were a total of 297 fintech unicorns in the world at the end of Q2’22.

Top investors: Tiger Global is the top investor in this year’s Fintech 250 by a significant margin, having backed equity deals to 45 of the winners, including Stripe, Checkout.com, and Revolut, since 2017. Accel is second with 29 companies in its portfolio, followed by Ribbit Capital with 27.

Innovation at the earlier stages: Thirty-two (13%) of our winners are seed, Series A, or Series B startups.

To highlight a few, MoonPay provides fiat-to-crypto on- and off-ramps for crypto and NFT businesses, enabling them to accept traditional payment methods. International insurtech bolttech is building a global insurance exchange that connects insurers, distribution partners, and customers, to change the way insurance is bought and sold. Finally, StockGro is an India-based social investing app that allows users to invest virtual money to learn about stocks, play games, and win rewards.

THE FINTECH 250 CLASS OF 2021: WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

Since the start of October 2021, the 2021 Fintech 250 winners have posted a number of accomplishments, including:

• Nearly $20B in equity funding raised across 150+ deals (as of 09/20/2022)
• 68 mega-rounds (deals worth $100M+), including a $1B Series D to payments platform Checkout.com
• 5 exits, including 3 acquisitions and 2 IPOs (AvidXchange and Nubank)
• 20 new entrants to the $1B+ unicorn club, including Alchemy, Cross River Bank, and Qonto

If you want to learn more about the Fintech 250 Class of 2021, check out the full list of previous winners.

The post The Fintech 250: The most promising fintech companies of 2022 appeared first on CB Insights Research.